<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Keeper Conundrum</title>
	<link>http://skyking162.com/2006/04/the-keeper-conundrum/</link>
	<description>baseball with a hint of lime</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://skyking162.com/2006/04/the-keeper-conundrum/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://skyking162.com/2006/04/the-keeper-conundrum/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>What about leagues where the salary of players kept increases each year?  Hypothetically speaking, of course. :)  Actually, I know you'd treat it the same way, just with new salaries (of course), but in determining who to draft or keep - especially with multi-year decisions - it seems to diminish the impact the keeper game has on the league.  I was mostly curious if you had any other nuggets of wisdom on this type of league.

For example, our team stocked up on mid-priced established players, both in the keepers and the auction, but few will likely be kept next year at a $5 higher salary.  Other teams did stars and scrubs and got a few $1 guys who, in a 14 team mixed league are risky, but could pay off for a couple more years.  I'm wondering if we should have taken that approach.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about leagues where the salary of players kept increases each year?  Hypothetically speaking, of course. :)  Actually, I know you&#8217;d treat it the same way, just with new salaries (of course), but in determining who to draft or keep - especially with multi-year decisions - it seems to diminish the impact the keeper game has on the league.  I was mostly curious if you had any other nuggets of wisdom on this type of league.</p>
<p>For example, our team stocked up on mid-priced established players, both in the keepers and the auction, but few will likely be kept next year at a $5 higher salary.  Other teams did stars and scrubs and got a few $1 guys who, in a 14 team mixed league are risky, but could pay off for a couple more years.  I&#8217;m wondering if we should have taken that approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
