<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Around The Web 11-3-07</title>
	<link>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/</link>
	<description>baseball with a hint of lime</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Teisha Panama</title>
		<link>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-1452</link>
		<dc:creator>Teisha Panama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-1452</guid>
		<description>I usually don't commonly post on many another Blogs, nevertheless I just has to say thank you... keep up the amazing work.  Ok regrettably its time to get to school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually don&#8217;t commonly post on many another Blogs, nevertheless I just has to say thank you&#8230; keep up the amazing work.  Ok regrettably its time to get to school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-754</guid>
		<description>Dan, it definitely &lt;strong&gt;should&lt;/strong&gt; take more than Melky and Betemit to get Lincecum, but Sabean's a big wild card.  Would the Yankees trade Cano for Lincecum?  Cano's a 4-win player.  Is the high-risk, high-reward of Lincecum worth that?  Very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, it definitely <strong>should</strong> take more than Melky and Betemit to get Lincecum, but Sabean&#8217;s a big wild card.  Would the Yankees trade Cano for Lincecum?  Cano&#8217;s a 4-win player.  Is the high-risk, high-reward of Lincecum worth that?  Very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-753</guid>
		<description>I think it'd take more than melky and betemit to get Lincecum. They're not gonna just give him away, he's the future ace of the team. Not sure how familiar you are with the Yankees system, but they'd probably have to give Melky and possibly Horne, Austin Jackson, or another prospect. If the Giants want only a good hitter and no prospects, it would probably take Cano.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;d take more than melky and betemit to get Lincecum. They&#8217;re not gonna just give him away, he&#8217;s the future ace of the team. Not sure how familiar you are with the Yankees system, but they&#8217;d probably have to give Melky and possibly Horne, Austin Jackson, or another prospect. If the Giants want only a good hitter and no prospects, it would probably take Cano.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sky</title>
		<link>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-752</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mock.  It had been a couple weeks since I read your article.  I added a note in my post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mock.  It had been a couple weeks since I read your article.  I added a note in my post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MockingBird</title>
		<link>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>MockingBird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://skyking162.com/2007/11/around-the-web-11-3-07/#comment-751</guid>
		<description>A minor quibble...in that article I'm actually arguing that the pitchtracker strike zone is set much narrower than even the rulebook one. It wouldn't have been so bad if it was just literally interpreting it, but instead it was terrrrible, to the tune of another 2-3 inches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minor quibble&#8230;in that article I&#8217;m actually arguing that the pitchtracker strike zone is set much narrower than even the rulebook one. It wouldn&#8217;t have been so bad if it was just literally interpreting it, but instead it was terrrrible, to the tune of another 2-3 inches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
  
